Saturday, April 4, 2009

ANALYZE THIS!



Die Another Day lyrics

I'm gonna wake up, yes and no
I'm gonna kiss some part of
I'm gonna keep this secret
I'm gonna close my body now

I guess, die another day
I guess, die another day
I guess, die another day
I guess, die another day

I guess I'll die another day
(Another day)
I guess I'll die another day
(Another day)
I guess I'll die another day
(Another day)
I guess I'll die another day

Sigmund Freud
Analyze this
Analyze this
Analyze this

I'm gonna break the cycle
I'm gonna shake up the system
I'm gonna destroy my ego
I'm gonna close my body now

Uh, uh

I think I'll find another way
There's so much more to know
I guess I'll die another day
It's not my time to go

For every sin, I'll have to pay
I've come to work, I've come to play
I think I'll find another way
It's not my time to go

I'm gonna avoid the cliche
I'm gonna suspend my senses
I'm gonna delay my pleasure
I'm gonna close my body now

I guess, die another day
I guess I'll die another day
I guess, die another day
I guess I'll die another day

I think I'll find another way
There's so much more to know
I guess I'll die another day
It's not my time to go

Uh, uh

[Laugh]

I guess, die another day
I guess I'll die another day
I guess, die another day
I guess I'll die another day

Another day [x6]

FAIR WIND!
VPi
:x
------------
FREEDOM!

Friday, March 27, 2009

The most harmless drug and the best medicine

God created the world and gave this ability to create to man. It is strange that man feels entirely full and happy when he creates something that interest him with full capacity. When we create we fall in another dimension. Time is different. There is no time. Man charges himself with energy, another energy from different level( not the common energy from food, breathing and sleeping). The condition in which he falls is like that of the usage of opium. Our soul is jubilating and we are full of pleasure. The most harmless drug and the best medicine in my opinion.

I decided to share with you some of my paintings. I`m not a professional painter, even the opposite. I decided to share with you the making of my last painting. I hope you will like it.

Freedom,
VPi

Saturday, January 3, 2009

Skyscapes






We have often heard about landscapes and rarely about seascapes but almost never about skyscapes. So i decided to promote this type of art here because there is nothing more beautiful than the sky. It is amazing experience to turn your head up and your stare to be absorbed by this incredible picture and knowing you are staring to the eternity you are charged with great energy. (Beauty gives positive energy and pleasure.)

Tuesday, December 30, 2008

Winning and Losing in Hemingway`s vision

Winner Take Nothing, 27th of October 1933

The collection presents the reality as horrible and cruel because of the historical period (disillusionment after the I World War and the Great Depression)or because of the tragic events in Hemingway’s life at that time. All pieces have tragic and pessimistic decoration. Hemingway depicts distorted characters as the distorted pictures of Pablo Picasso. Often his disillusionment transfers in black mockery and satire. The stories are symbols which got together construct the idea of the collection mentioned in the epigraph and the title. This is an existential quest. Quest for the great questions, for the sense of human life, for the aim of man, for his winning and losing in life and who is the real winner in fact. Hemingway gives his answers and coins his philosophy.

1. the reality - The Gambler, the Nun and the Radio
The need to fog our minds, the need for opium, reality is futile and absurd, human condition bad, man is doomed to pain, sufferings and losing.

2. the human soul - The Light of the World
Beauty and power of human soul, the inner strengths of man, who even in bad situation is believing, hoping and loving. Inner strengths which give power to human beings to keep going. Man can be destroyed but not defeated because of these inner strengths.

3. the winning - A Way You’ll Never Be
Winning is in that that we don’t give up and win against fate with courage.

4. the fight - A Day’s Wait
The sense of life is this fight and man shows his real face in that fight. Hemingway likes fair fighters, who stoically bare the plays of fate and victory it without showing any weakness.

5. the way of fight - A Clean, Well – Lighted Place
Stoically accepting the kicks of fate, bravely with self – respect with elegance and dignity.

6. The fight with fate is unequal.
Man is ordained to lose but he can win against providence with his courage, elegance and dignity, but he won’t get a prize, the opposite he will be put to more tests and trails. In this fight man shows his real face.

7. the losing - Fathers and Sons, The Sea Change, After the Storm
The motif is not clearly declared in the collection. It is undercurrent line and has its unvoiced messages and unstated conclusions. The motif of losing is omitted. Man is losing everything – happiness, love, dear people, gold, health, life. The mean strokes of fate. Ironic story.

8. God - A Natural History of the Dead
Even God is not concerned in the absurd and cruel and desperate condition of man.

Tuesday, August 19, 2008

The True Art

They say that error is inadmissible in the good craftsmanship and unavoidable in the true work of art (which may be true) and that just in that is the difference between the first and the second (which is suspicious).

Unknown originator

Thursday, August 14, 2008

Who is more strange?

I want to begin with that that I didn’t like that man although he was not so bad.

He was nothing special, one of those people who you see and immediately forget. He was not eminent with anything. He had ordinary looks, not ugly but so ordinary that he seemed ugly. He was common and ordinary and simple. He had simple rules learned from his grandparents from the countryside and he followed them blindly. In fact they worked, but only for people like him. He was from the countryside too. He was trying to settle in the big city and to become a citizen of the capital. He wanted to marry in the capital to a nice woman and to have good family, as the old grandparents taught him.

We worked in the same department as me and from time to time we drank beer together after work. The first time he invited me as a gentleman then as a gentleman he started to show indifference towards me, trying to manipulate me and to evoke in me the feelings: “O, why doesn’t he like me anymore? Am I not good? Am I not beautiful?” But those are thoughts of a simple girl and I wasn’t so stupid that time. Life has learned me that already. He started to try to impose upon me. I liked one café where we spent our lunch breaks and drank coffee and after several times he said he didn’t want to go there. He started to whimsical. He didn`t want to go there, to sit here, to eat somewhere. He started to play old tricks. I asked him once out, to go to a lunch break and he said: “No. I will go out and have one sandwich. I don’t want to go out.” I never called him again after that. The manipulation he was trying to apply on me only cheered me up and I was entertained. Entertained in that way that I started to tease him to tell him how rich am I in order he to think that he had come across to a diamond and a very good victim. I did it slightly and he never knew. He thought he was playing the game but the game was played by me. I spoke I had some possessions, cars, apartments, real estates, I told him about vacations abroad and he get the hook. After that I felt regret but he deserved it. And I believe that everyone must get what he deserves. And I don`t say it. Don’t you remember the parable about the Judgment Day.

Often on our beer meetings I was speaking and he was listening. He was not secret, he just was simple and hadn’t much to say.
“What happened today in your office?” - he was sounding.
“Hm. Nothing special, just ordinary things.”
“How was your colleague Angy today?”
“She was fine. Demonic as always.”
“What do you think about Patrick?”
Patrick was the chief of the other department.
“He is a clever man, I like him.”
He smiled.
I knew what simple thought is rounding in his mind, but for a pity that was all his ability.
For him I was strange though he never said that to me. With his simple mind and simple rules he couldn’t understand my vigor, wish to entertain, necessity to smile every time 1000 times. He didn’t understand even the passion with which I spoke for everything. We were too different.

He was already 31 years old and it was (as simple men think) time to create your own nest – family and to continue to live the ordinary life but with a partner. He thought that it is time for him to marry. And he was looking around. I was one of his victims. I had to be pleased.
He was so ordinary, so simple. Of great importance of him were the social and living kitchen-sink standards and everything besides this was strange and unneeded. For happiness or not he guessed the right philosophy for living in order to suffer in minimal amounts and to lead and in future painless life. Maybe his grandparents are not so stupid or they just copy what was said to them from their grandparents, got from the wisdom of the generations and from the past, from where all truths emerge. Old philosophy, which saves you, but is not so interesting and entertaining. We must learn and entertain ourselves in this world not to save ourselves doing the most ordinary and the very simple. We must try to learn to fly.

So this man was given that simple philosophy God knows from where, he had simple looks, simple mind, simple life and he was looking for a woman to marry if it could be a pretty one. But she can be and slightly ugly – the philosophy accepted this even recommended it. He was looking for a simple woman like him, but he didn’t know it. I was a target but I was not so good according to the philosophy. I don’t believe he had ever fall in love with anyone. But maybe here I may be wrong.
“What is doing Martha?"
Martha was one of my colleagues.
“Nothing, I don’t know.”
“Does she have a boyfriend?”
“Yes, I think she has. Do you like her?”
“No, just asking.”

This man will not contribute to the world with nothing as hundred others. But he didn’t care or didn’t realize it. He just wanted to marry, because it is time. Men often show off with their wish of freedom and independence, with their fear of relationships and marriage. But this is one delusion. Most of them are afraid, more afraid than women. They fear from loneliness and they try to guarantee themselves. It is often met, man around 30s to look for a woman to marry and he wants this on any price and after that (after approximately 4 years) he realizes that he was wrong. Man can not marry because it is necessary and it is time. Man must marry when he is ready for this. No because "it is time", or because "the time came".

“What happened with Cloud and Diana? Did they come back from Vienna?”
“Not yet. They come tomorrow.”
“Is there some news about the deal with the selling of the company? Have you heard something? Have you heard something for the new owners?”
“No. I receive just the e- mails they send to all of us with the information about the process.”
“What is doing Renate?"
“I don’t know. I don’t like her. I m not interested in her.”

On our meetings for a mug of beer after work I often retold him stories from my life which was full of adventures. He was listening and often secretly sniggered at me because he thought he was more clever then me. He only was questioning for ordinary things not telling anything about his life and was sounding around to get information. And as I was talkative I was interesting and useful to him. One day as I was his target for marring or whatever he thought he asked me again sounding around how many relationships I have had.
“One long and several short” – was my answer – “But I have many relationships with boys which for one or other reason didn’t develop in real intimate relationship and they stayed on the level of friendship. I fall often strongly in love and my feelings are deep. And I even liked one boy 3 years!"
He was pragmatic and asked: “Were you a couple?”
“No. It didn’t happen.”
“How can you be in love with a man 3 years not having anything with him?"
“I had.” – I told him – "I had friendship.”

In that moment I realized that the strange is not me but he – the ordinary. And this question for the very same time proved how simple he is and how simple he thinks and how simple life lies in front of him full of emptiness. This question maybe proves that he never felt the feeling of love. He never tasted the bitter taste of unshared love, the pain of not being the one and the secret hope that one day you will be. He never dreamed for a beloved person. He was an empty man. He was pragmatic, so simple and clear.

Till now I can’t believe that this happened and that there is such a man in the world. I often ask myself remaining this dialogue: “Who is the more strange?”

“What are you going to do in the weekend?” – he asked
“I don’t know yet.”
“We can go to a walk in the park.”
“Yes, why not.”

But we never went.

Tuesday, August 12, 2008

Black magic and Destruction of Humankind

Nowadays the state is the institution which guarantees the law and the moral of society. There are some laws but the unpunished evil is spreading around. We see it everywhere. Rude behavior, bad deeds. The state can control only part of our lives and can protect only part of our rights. The unpunished evil is spreading, which proofs that the people must be threaten and punished which made partly the law in the middle ages, provoked by religion (my beloved religion). People putted without law and restrictions are evil, aggressive. They are like animals. Not all of them, but most.

One of this unpunished evil is the black magic. For me it in fact doesn`t exist. It is not restricted so if it existed with so many evil people the humankind would have destroyed itself and disappeared years ago. The evil people are more than good, and having the power to do bad unrestricted they would do it for sure.

In controversy of the hatred on Earth for me there is Supreme Great Power with high reason. I believe in it. It is good but and strict and sometimes is like the bad teacher. Only that why it can mange with the evil which is spread on the Earth.
So there is no black magic because if it had we would never be here now.

The black magic influences on the level of mind. You must see something made, you must hear, or you yourself to suggest that. It operates on that level. But for the doer of the magic for him this is disaster. The bad deed he did follows him all his life.

And this deed always returns to him again and again. He knows he is sinner and his consciousness doesn`t give him liberation. He himself made it or ordered it. He made all in self - aware condition. And this works on his subconsciousness. The bad deed.
And no matter if the black magic works or not for the victim for the doer and orderer it is returned 100 times. It works on his subconsciousness, it eats him from inside. This is the balance. What is done it returns back to you. You can test it with the smile. This balance we see everywhere in the nature. You do bad, you receive bad. This the principle of the Karma. You pay for all your deeds. You pay now you pay and in your future life, but mostly you pay now. This is the balance. Karma does`t means destiny. Karma means action and opposition. And the Supreme strict and fair Reason keeps the good and punishes the bad in that life. There are a lot of parables about that. So black magic is bad only for the doer. It rarely touches the victim. It is a myth like the vampires. But also it evokes the evil in people who believe they can do something unpunished bad to other. And often they themselves are punished. And for that they must be angry to themselves.

The Test

With so many gold, money and possessions in this world we must learn our souls to not notice them and to go on higher level where nothing is needed only curiosity for knowledge, investigation and impulse for creation. This world full of gold, money and possessions is a test for our souls. It is so obvious. Obvious is also that even having all these money , gold and possessions you are not happy. You are happy only when you gather knowledge and create and of course when you receive love. Because we are little Gods, as one African parable tells. And slowly we during our transformations (because Death is transformation) we will reach higher states and we will go on next level - maybe there is better.. I don`t know. I know only that soul develops to reach perfection. Maybe one day to rule the other not so perfect souls...but this is the machine or the system I don`t understand and I let it to God or to the Supreme Power as I call it. We are powerless in front of him. He rules and he decides. AMOR FATI (love your destiny). This is term from Nietzsche`s philosophy. Very right and true. We are helpless and we must be submissive. We don`t decide nothing. Is this a test of our soul or just life full of obstacles and sufferings which we must go through? But this is a test too.

Friday, August 8, 2008

Mr. Killer

I met Mr. Killer several times, but he din`t kill me. He made me just more wiser and stronger.Thank you Mr. Killer. Some people say poison is useful in small amounts. I feel i get just enough of you Mr. Killer. I feel well now. You gave me that that nobody could give me. You made me the person I am. And I appreciate this. Thank you Mr. Killer.
Thank you that you did`t kill me.

Religious freedom

Most people are occupied with religions. Maybe because it is modern or because they search for an answer to the existential problems, which torment only one small amount of people of the population of this nice and beautiful planet. Why religion is so popular or unpopular? We have more interesting things to do than to occupy with religion. But nevertheless we occupy so often with it. Maybe because it was the rule and the order and the truth for so long and we don`t want to be restricted and if restricted to know why, because of what and maybe because religion is the door to the unknown. And we know the unknown so often is very attractive. Secrets are attractive. But the domination of religion in our life recently came to an end. God is dead. Dostoevsky dethroned him. Now we are free, but we want to believe in something. Our mind is thus constructed that it has to be a way, a rule, logic that explains everything. Now we are free to believe in whatever we like and to fell happy. To fell not restricted by someone. Now The New Age is coming. It is a new kind of relation to God. Now we are allowed to speak to him, to be angry at him, to curse him. He will forgive us. Now in that new religion everybody depends on himself and has his own religion and behaves as he likes. (There is term New Age and it is a 21st century religious current). Maybe that`s freedom. And if we must obey the rule of freedom everybody can believe in whatever he wants but not disturbing or manipulating the others. That`s real freedom of belief. The church always wanted to control the masses. Now everyone can choose in what to believe. And the rule of freedom is kept as long as he does not try to manipulate others to make them his followers or slaves, because the option of power often obsesses the minds of people. I am ready to accept even a worship of one flower or tree but if this doesn’t disturb the freedom of others. If somebody wants he can worship a stone or an animal but this must not be developed in religion trying to convince some followers or manipulate peoples` minds, which are so confused living in this hard reality. If somebody believes in something it must be only his decision and he to take the responsibilities of his decisions. He must not try to get followers to become a guru or what ever, to use the suffering of people or to use those, who want to be saved. There are so confused people with so many sufferings and unanswered questions. It is a crime to use their weakness. They just want to be happy but they don’t know how.

I believe in free religion. Everyone to do what he thinks it is good. It is the best religion because you are not afraid of punishment, you just are yourself and if there is Great Power she will accept you because you are its child and it is always ready to forgive as they say. That is why I don`t accept Islam. It is good religion, teaching people to be good, giving some rules, but it is transformed in a device for manipulation. Every man has free will and chance to be unique why we must be restricted by some people, not by religion, but by people? In the Bible is said “Don’t give to the man fish, teach him how to fish.” Why someone has to tell you what to do. Everyone has the right of free will. You can fish, you can decide when to fish, you can not fish at all, you can fish every day several times. The choice is your. The biggest opposition of free will is manipulation. Everybody has his own head. He can precisely decide what is wrong and what is bad. We have such a society, which had given so freedom to everyone of us. Why somebody must tell me how to behave. It is a medieval practice. That is why I openly criticize Islam. For me that religion used in this way gives only pain and blood. The soldiers of Islam, they even don’t know for what they are fighting for. They are zombies. They are used in the plan of their own supreme rulers. For them it is convenient to have such a war, to have such restricting rules. But who suffers - the ordinary man. I worship these warriors who give their life for their sacred deed and beliefs. It is great sacrifice. If you think, this is the greatest sacrifice one man can do - to give up from their own life in the name of others for an idea. Ideas are …..the highest. Materialism has no place here. So people die for ideas and those ideas serve to the materialistic rulers of these countries. The fair fighters and believers are heroes, all these Arab hara-kiri-s. They are God blessed. But unfortunately they are used by the masquerade of their rulers who don’t want educated people who want ignorant zombies in order to make way to their politics and further wealth gaining. Because for them it is never enough – the rule of materialism. They want more and more. And the opposite the idea rule – they don’t want anything. The Arabs are betrayed by their own high - placed rulers. Innocent people die and these tycoons get more and more gold and money. For them it is convenient this separation to Arabs and rest of the World. They make it themselves and use religion for excuse of their deeds and to move the point of importance and truth. They need ignorant people in order to rule the masses as they like. They preach praying to this God who I am sure doesn’t accept what they do. But he is silent. Is he?

I believe in religion tolerance. Why we can live with Buddhists, Confucians and Protestants and Orthodox followers and Catholics and we can not live with Islam? Why in 21st century we have religious wars like in the middle ages? Maybe that is convenient for someone. For whom I don’t know. But I advocate for religious tolerance, because all we are humans and suffer equally and are happy equally. Why we must destroy each other for so dogmatic principles? God as we know him is long time ago dead. God transformed as our society transformed he as a clever man doesn’t go far behind, he renews himself to answer to the problems of the 21st century man. God is smart and rules smart. This what is operating in the Islam world is one machine which wants by old dogmatic and undemocratic rules to dominate. Everyone can believe in whatever he wants and whatever makes him happy and better man but he must not try to convince people to follow him or to manipulate them using them for his own interests. Religion is for the good, not for war. It is to make us better, to help us in our development. So believe in flower, believe in wind, believe in sea, be good, keep your inner spirit calm, do the best you can but not try to manipulate others, do not try to convince them to do something for you. Vice versa do something good for them. You are free. Make other free too. Give them the option to reach their own truth. Don’t manipulate, don’t use people. God said he is ONE. In all religions he says he is ONE and ONLY. This is the simple answer. All religions, preaching one and the same in fact are one religion and their God is ONE. He himself gave us the key. The key - religious tolerance. He is in us, we are in him and he is us and we are him. We are small Gods, we create, we imagine, we make art, we make and the beauty and the ugliness. We can make everything what he did on this planet. We can reach the skies and be angels and we can go to the hell and become demons. All is about us. And we must not deny the church. It was useful but no any more. It must transform either. You saw that in the 2000 year nothing happened. The church was one old, scarecrow. But it is not useful now. It is dieing institution. It has to coin new political and philosophical line. People are on a higher level now and they don’t need scarecrows anymore. They are developing and now they must struggle with their own conscious and themselves and with others. Every man knows enough now to make his free choice and to bear his punishment. Everything is in our hands and we must rule well ourselves. The punishment comes in this life. If you think about this a bit you will see. You can’t deny that there is no justice here on Earth. Think what you do and what will follow because the punishment is here and now. You can not be bad all your life and to expect good, except if you are a lucky person. But those are so few. So think wise. Do what you think it must be done, what is good and what will be in synchrony with your soul. Be your own judge and your own saver.

Everyone must do what his soul thinks it is right to do. Try to make your own rules with which to feel comfortable. Not messing with others. Not greedy for power. Because the highest devotion is self-denying, rejecting of your own ego in the name of others. The same Christ gave us this example. Life is a theater – said the old thinkers. Now we can say that life is a PC game or matrix. Both may be true. Some don’t realize it, other do. But nobody knows why we are here. Maybe to reject our ego and to do good to others not waiting gratitude. Why people so rare say "Thank you!"? Why, when they are so happy when they receive this so rarely given "Thank you!"? So be kind and tolerant and try to make people happy although you will hear this "Thank you!" very rarely.

Tuesday, August 5, 2008

Ode to Romanticism

Romanticism
Percy Bysshe Shelley (1792-1822) is one of the most significant poets in all times. His poetry, revolutionary or loving, remains deep marks in the mind with its ideas and in in the soul with its great expressions and picturesque images and in heart with its striking emotions and deep sentiments. Percy Bysshe Shelley is outstanding representative of the late Romantic poets from the late 18th and the beginning of the 19th century.

Romanticism has some typical characteristics which determine its essence. In the first place it is its medievalism, longing to the past and fascination with the glamour of the middle ages. Escapism is very often met in the poetry of Romantic poets. They want to escape from reality, to take refuge in the glorious past, in utopian future, or in a distant exotic present. They want to save themselves from the industrial cities, to go to oasis, where harmony exists.

Romanticists believe in progress although they don’t like the reality and its modern face. They assume that destiny of man is dynamic, evolutionary, progressive. They are sure that there is development from the negative to the positive. They believe in the man. They are rebels and protest against dogmatism of the church, scientific impersonality and inhumanity. They deny rationalism. In fact the Romantic school is reaction to the Enlightenment, which main feature is the cult of reason.

As a political orientation and sight for the order of life they are republicans. They have hostility towards monarchical structure. This idea of human equality and democracy they take from John Locke and the Age of Reason and fill it with emotional fervor. But the sense of freedom is accompanied with sense of pessimism, which leads them to despair, world grief and pain.

Inherited the idea of equality of man Romantics believe in the inherent worth of every man and his uniqueness. This belief shows them as great humanists. They believe in the human hearth. They preach that the hearth, the emotion, the goodness and humanity are more important than intellect. Evil is associated with intelligence.

With Romantics comes the worship of originality and individualism. The poet for Romanticists is the man gifted with creative imagination and originality. The major subject of the Romanticists is himself, the individual, his confessions, his emotions, his feelings. They enjoy emotion for its own sake. They fall in bottomless emotional depths in their poems.

They see the purpose of art as purgative and artist as one who must be purified trough art. Art is seen as necessary relief after the sufferings and terror, a final result after the purgation of the artist as Aristotle claimed.

In their poems they show love towards the wild and the picturesque, towards nature, which they depict vividly and with strong emotion. Their hatred towards civilization is obvious as their love to nature. In their poetry often are praised beautiful and unforgettable images of nature, which impress with their reality and lyricism.

Percy Bysshe Shelley

Percy Bysshe Shelley was the son of a prosperous squire. He entered Oxford in 1810, where readings in philosophy led him toward the study of the empiricists and the modern skeptics, notably William Godwin. In 1811 he and his friend Thomas Jefferson Hogg published their pamphlet, „The Necessity of Atheism”, which resulted in their immediate expulsion from the university. The same year Shelley eloped with 16-year-old Harriet Westbrook, by whom he eventually had two children, Ianthe and Charles.
Supported reluctantly by their fathers, the young couple traveled through Great Britain. Shelley’s life continued to be dominated by his desire for social and political reform, and he was constantly publishing pamphlets. His first important poem, „Queen Mab”, privately printed in 1813, set forth a radical system of curing social ills by advocating the destruction of various established institutions.
In 1814 Shelley left England for France with Mary Godwin, the daughter of William Godwin. During their first year together they were plagued by social ostracism and financial difficulties. However, in 1815 Shelley’s grandfather died and left him an annual income. „Laon and Cynthna” appeared in 1817 but was withdrawn and reissued the following year as „The Revolt of Islam”. It is a long poem in Spenserian stanzas that tells of a revolution and illustrates the growth of the human mind aspiring toward perfection.
After Harriet Shelley’s suicide in 1816, Shelley and Mary officially married. In 1817 Harriet’s parents obtained a decree from the lord chancellor stating that Shelley was unfit to have custody of his children. The following year Shelley and Mary left England and settled in Italy. By this time their household consisted of their own three children and Mary’s half-sister Claire Claremont and her daughter Allegra (whose father was Lord Byron). On July 8, 1822, Shelley was drowned while sailing in the Bay of Spezia, near Lerici.

Ode to the West Wind

Percy Bysshe Shelley composed the poem "Ode to the West Wind" in 1819 and published it in 1820. Some have interpreted the poem to be an expression of the speaker lamenting his current situation, but at the same time rejoicing in the fact his/her written works will have influence over people in the same situation. More than anything else, Shelley wanted his message of reform and revolution spread, and the wind becomes the trope for spreading the word of change.
The poem “Ode to the West Wind” consists of five cantos written in tetra rime. The Ode is written in iambic pentameter. The poem begins with three cantos describing the wind's effects upon earth, air, and ocean. The last two cantos are Shelley speaking directly to the wind, asking for its power, to lift him like a leaf, or a cloud and make him its companion in its wanderings. He asks the wind to take his thoughts and spread them all over the world so that the youth are awoken with his ideas.
The poem can be divided in two parts: the first three cantos are about the qualities of the ‘Wind’; the fact that these three cantos belong together can visually be seen by the phrase ‘Oh hear!’ at the end of each of the three cantos. Whereas the last two cantos give a relation between the ‘Wind’ and the speaker, there is a turn at the beginning of the fourth canto; the focus is now on the speaker, or better the hearer, and what he is going to hear.

First Canto
The first stanza begins with the alliteration ‘wild West Wind’. The reader gets the impression that the wind is something that lives, because he is ‘wild’ – it is a kind of personification of the ‘wind’. Even after reading the headline and the alliteration, one might have the feeling that the canto might somehow be positive. The first few lines consist of a lot of sinister elements, such as ‘dead leaves’. The inversion of ‘leaves dead’ in the first canto underlines the fatality by putting the word ‘dead’ at the end of the line so that it rhymes with the next lines. The sentence goes on and makes these ‘dead’ leaves live again as ‘ghosts’ that flee from something that panics them. The colorful context makes it easier for the reader to visualize what is going on – even if it is in an uncomfortable manner. ‘Yellow’ can be seen as the ugly hue of ‘pestilence-stricken’ skin; and ‘hectic red’, though evoking the pace of the poem itself, could also highlight the pace of death brought to multitudes. There is also a strange synchronous in the color ‘black’ and the adjective ‘pale’ (ominous symbols).

In the word ‘chariotest’ the ‘est’ is added to the verb stem ‘chariot’, probably to indicate the second person singular, after the subject ‘thou’ . The ‘corpse within its grave’ in the next line is in contrast to the ‘azure sister of the Spring’ – a reference to the east wind – whose ‘living hues and odors plain’ evoke a strong contrast to the colors of the fourth line of the poem that evoke death. The last line of this canto (‘Destroyer and Preserver’) refers to the west wind. The west wind is considered the ‘Destroyer’ because it drives the last signs of life from the trees. He is also considered the ‘Preserver’ for scattering the seeds which will come to life in the spring.

Second Canto

The second canto of the poem is much more fluid than the first one. The sky’s ‘clouds’ are ‘like earth’s decaying leaves’. They are a reference to the second line of the first canto (‘leaves dead’). Through this reference the landscape is recalled again. The ‘clouds’ are ‘Shook from the tangled boughs of Heaven and Ocean’. This probably refers to the fact that the line between the sky and the stormy sea is indistinguishable and the whole space from the horizon to the zenith is covered with storm clouds. The ‘clouds’ can also be seen as ‘Angels of rain’. In a biblical way, they may be messengers that bring a message from heaven down to earth through rain and lightning. These two natural phenomena (ocean and sky) bring a transformation – a storm is emerging to evoke the change.

Line 21 begins with ‘Of some fierce Maenad ...’ and again the west wind is part of the second canto of the poem; here he is two things at once: first he is ‘dirge/Of the dying year’ and second he is “a prophet of tumult whose prediction is decisive”; a prophet who does not only bring ‘black rain, and fire, and hail’, but who ‘will burst’ it. The ‘locks of the approaching storm’ are the messengers of this bursting.

Shelley in this canto “expands his vision from the earthly scene with the leaves before him to take in the vaster commotion of the skies”. This means that the wind is now no longer scatter only the leaves but has risen, getting more destructive, promising storm.

Third Canto

The question that comes up when reading the third canto at first is what the subject of the ‘blue Mediterranean’. It is said that ‘he lay, / Lulled by the coil of this crystalline streams, /Beside a pumice isle in Baiae’s bay, / And saw in sleep old palaces and towers’. This is obviously a slight ironical remark of the exotic and perfect place for escape, where the loving feelings overtake the poet, which Shelley often visits. He doesn’t want anymore the safe place of illusions and beauty. He comes to reality and depicts the world with all its harshness. The ‘wind’ – ‘saw’ the city, which may lead to the association of the human civilization and its glorious past with its great palaces and towers, symbol of power and strength, which now are mere reflection in the water.

The ‘wind’ appears as something that plays the role of a Creator and of a changing power. It comes and transforms the world, bringing the new and the truthful, the new birth of the Spring. It creates the new beginning and the desired change, blowing away the old and exhausted.

Whereas Shelley had accepted death and impending storm in the first and second canto, he now turns to the fear which the awaited change evokes. From line 26 to line 36 he gives an image of nature. Line 36 begins with the sentence ‘So sweet, the sense faints picturing them’. And indeed, the picture Shelley gives us here seems to be ‘sweet’. ‘The sea-blooms’ are probably the plants at the bottom of the ocean and give a peaceful picture of what is under water. But if we look closer at line 36, we realize that the sentence is not what it appears to be at first sight. This shows that the idyllic picture is not what it seems to be and that the harmony will certainly soon be destroyed. A few lines later, Shelley suddenly talks about ‘fear’. This again shows the influence of the west wind which announces the change of the season.

Fourth Canto

The fourth canto shows – in comparison with the previous cantos – a turning-point. Whereas the cantos one to three begin with ‘O wild West Wind’ and ‘Thou...’ and are clearly directed to the wind, there is a change in the fourth canto. The focus is no more on the ‘wind’, but on the speaker who says ‘If I...’ Until this part, the poem has appeared very anonymous and was only concentrated on the ‘wind’ and its forces so that the author of the poem was more or less forgotten. It becomes more and more clear that what the author talks about now is himself. That this must be true, shows the frequency of the author’s use of the first-person pronouns ‘I’, ‘my’ and ‘me’. These pronouns appear nine times in the fourth canto. Certainly the author wants to dramatize the atmosphere so that the reader recalls the situation of canto one to three. He achieves this by using the same pictures of the previous cantos in this one. Whereas these images, such as ‘leaf’, ‘cloud’ and ‘wave’ have existed only together with the ‘wind’, they are now existing with the author. The author thinks about being one of them and says ‘If I were a ...’ Shelley here identifies himself with the wind, he wants to be liberated from the gloomy lot. He wishes he was young, filled with hope and faith. He says ‘Oh, lift me up as a wave, a leaf, a cloud’. He knows that this is something impossible to achieve, but he does not stop praying for it. He says: ‘I fall upon the thorns of life! I bleed!’ He confesses he is damaged by life and unable to fight (he is bleeding), but also confesses that once he was like the Wind (“one too like thee: tameless, and swift, and proud.”).

At the end of the canto the poet tells us that ‘a heavy weight of hours has chained and bowed’. This may be a reference to the years that have passed and ‘chained and bowed’ the hope of the people for the change. Confronting that, the West Wind becomes the opposite. The wind is the ‘uncontrollable’ who is ‘tameless’.

One more thing that one should mention is that this canto sounds like a kind of prayer or confession of the poet. This confession does not address God but beside this sounds very personal.

Shelley also changes his use of metaphors in this canto. In the first cantos the metaphors are frequent. Now the metaphors are only weakly presented – ‘the thorns of life’. Shelley also leaves out the fourth element: the fire. In the previous cantos he wrote about the earth, the air and the water. The reader now expects the fire – but it is not there. This leads to a break in the symmetry of the poem because the reader does not meet the fire until the fifth canto.

Fifth Canto

Again the wind is very important in this last canto. The wind with his ‘mighty harmonies’ becomes an artist or a Creator of sounds. At the beginning of the poem the ‘wind’ was only capable of blowing the leaves from the trees – a small storm, enlarging gradually through the poem; it receives its climax in the fifth canto.


Everything that had been said before was part of the elements – wind, earth and water. Now the fourth element comes in: the fire. In this way the poem is accomplished and gives the feeling of wholeness and completeness of the meanings. The “ashes and sparks” incline that the fight will start soon, after the Wind scatters the words of the poet among the mankind.

It is also necessary to mention that the first-person pronouns again appear in a great frequency; but the possessive pronoun ‘my’ predominates. Unlike the frequent use of the ‘I’ in the previous canto that made the canto sound self-conscious; this canto might now sound self-confident. The canto is no more a request or a prayer as it had been in the fourth canto – it is a demand.

The poet becomes the wind’s instrument – his ‘lyre’. This is a symbol of the poet’s participation towards the wind; he becomes his musician and the wind’s breath becomes his breath. The poet’s attitude towards the wind has changed: in the first canto the wind has been an ‘enchanter’, now the wind has become an ‘incantation’.

And there is another contrast between the two last cantos: in the fourth canto the poet had articulated himself in singular: ‘a leaf’, ‘a cloud’, ‘A wave’ and ‘One too like thee’. The last canto differs from that. The poet in this canto uses plural forms, for example, ‘my leaves’, ‘thy harmonies’, ‘my thoughts’, ‘ashes and sparks’ and ‘my lips’. By the use of the plural, the poet is able to show that there is some kind of multitude that brings safety and certainty. It even seems as if he has redefined himself because the uncertainty of the previous canto has been blown away. The ‘leaves’ merge with those of an entire forest. The ‘Will’ is ushered by “mighty harmonies”. The use of this ‘Will” is certainly a reference to the future. That something new will come with the transcendent will and world-shattering spirit of the wind.

At last, Shelley again calls the Wind in a kind of prayer and even wants him to be ‘his’ Spirit: he says: ‘My spirit! Be thou me, impetuous one!’ Like the leaves of the trees in a forest, his leaves will fall and decay and will perhaps soon flourish again when the spring comes. That may be why he is looking forward to the spring and asks at the end of the last canto ‘If Winter comes, can Spring be far behind?’ This is of course a rhetorical question because spring does come after winter and another renewal – spring - will come anyway. Thus the question has a deeper meaning and does not only mean the change of seasons, but is a reference to death and rebirth as well. It also indicates that after the struggles and problems, there would always be a new beginning. But the most powerful call to the Wind are the lines: "Drive my dead thoughts over the universe/Like withered leaves to quicken a new birth!" Here Shelley is imploring - or really chanting to - the Wind to blow away all of his useless thoughts so that he can be a vessel for the Wind and, as a result, awaken the Earth.